Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using non-linear responses of multiple taxonomic groups to establish criteria indicative of wetland biological condition

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Establishing criteria for protecting or improving wetland condition has often focused on physical and chemical factors, which can paint an incomplete picture of wetland quality. To protect the biological integrity of aquatic environments, identifying criteria based on biological responses to pollution is essential. We hypothesize that assessment of multiple taxonomic groups and response thresholds will provide statistically defensible effects-based methods to define reference condition and establish biological criteria. We used regression tree analysis to identify non-linear biological responses of three taxonomic groups (macrophytes, epiphytic diatoms, and plant-associated Zooplankton) collected from 36 depressional wetlands in the Muskegon River watershed (Michigan, USA). Multi-metric biotic indices were developed for all three taxonomic groups and these indices were combined to reveal biologically relevant thresholds along a gradient of human disturbance. We found these three taxonomic groups responded at similar levels of impairment and could be used to classify wetlands into three groups: reference sites representing the highest quality wetlands in the landscape; slightly altered sites where the most sensitive organisms responded (sensitive plants, diatoms); and degraded sites where extensive changes in community structure occurred, which may reflect a shift to an alternate state. For the Muskegon River watershed, in particular, this analysis allowed us to identify sites in need of restoration, including approximately one-third of the depressional wetlands in the watershed. This study outlines a method for identifying criteria that could be used for regulatory purposes. In particular, we recommend the use of community-level metrics in identifying broad-based changes in community composition that may represent shifts to alternate states, as well as the use of sensitive indicators, such as the occurrence of sensitive plant and diatom taxa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • American Public Health Association (APHA). 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, twentieth edition. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, J. M. 1976. An ignition method for determination of total phosphorus in lake sediments. Water Research 10: 329–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benbow, M. E. and R. W. Merritt. 2004. Road salt toxicity of select Michigan wetland macroinvertebrates under different testing conditions. Wetlands 24: 68–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berzins, B. and B. Pejler. 1989. Rotifer occurrence and trophic degree. Hydrobiologia 182: 171–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. P., T. J. O’Connell, D. H. Wardrop, and L. E. Jackson. 1998. Towards a regional index of biological integrity: the example of forested riparian ecosystems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 51: 141–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, C., C. B. Craft, D. W. Rogers, and C. J. Richardson. 2000. Effects of four years of nitrogen and phosphorus additions on Everglades plant communities. Aquatic Botany 68: 61–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, C. 2002. Methods for Evaluating Wetland Condition: Vegetation-Based Indicators of Wetland Nutrient Enrichment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, USA. EPA-822-R-02-024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crumpton, W. G., T. M. Isenhart, and P. D. Mitchell. 1992. Nitrate and organic N analyses with second-derivative spectroscopy. Limnology and Oceanography 37: 907–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cyr, H. and J. A. Downing. 1988. The abundance of phytophilous invertebrates on different species of submerged macrophytes. Freshwater Biology 20: 365–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielson, T. J. 2001. Methods for Evaluating Wetland Condition: Introduction to Wetland Biological Assessment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, USA. EPA 822-R-01-007a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S. P. and S. J. Jackson. 2006. The biological condition gradient: a descriptive model for interpreting change in aquatic ecosystems. Ecological Applications 16: 1251–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, I. C., J. D. Green, K. Thompson, and R. J. Shiel. 2001. The influence of macrophytes on the spatial distribution of littoral rotifers. Freshwater Biology 46: 777–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fennessy, S., M. Gernes, J. Mack, and D. Heller Wardrop. 2002. Methods for Evaluating Wetland Condition: Using Vegetation To Assess Environmental Conditions in Wetlands. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, USA. EPA-822-R-02-020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, C. P., R. H. Norris, J. N. Hogue, and J. W. Feminella. 2000. Development and evaluation of predictive models for measuring biological integrity of streams. Ecological Applications 10: 1456–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, K. D., L. A. Masters, M. R. Penskar, A. A. Reznicek, G. S. Wilhelm, W. W. Brodovich, and K. P. Gardiner. 2001. Floristic quality assessment with wetland categories and examples of computer applications for the state of Michigan — Revised 2nd edition. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife, Natural Heritage Program, Lansing, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. S. and C. J. Richardson. 2003. Integrating bioassessment and ecological risk assessment: an approach to developing numerical water-quality criteria. Environmental Management 31: 795–809.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutka, F. J. and C. Richards. 1996. Relating diatom assemblage structure to stream habitat quality. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15: 469–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalonde, S. and J. A. Downing. 1991. Epiphyton biomass is related to lake trophic status, depth, and macrophyte architecture. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48: 2285–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, D. M., J. W. Barko, D. Strayer, J. M. Melack, G. G. Mittelbach, R. W. Howarth, B. Menge, and J. E. Titus. 1988. Spatial heterogeneity and habitat interactions in lake communities. p. 181–208. In S. R. Carpenter (ed.) Complex Interactions in Lake Communities. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lougheed, V. L. and P. Chow-Fraser. 2002. Development and use of a Zooplankton index of wetland quality in the Laurentian Great Lakes basin. Ecological Applications 12: 474–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lougheed, V. L., B. Crosbie, and P. Chow-Fraser. 2001. Primary determinants of macrophyte community structure in 62 marshes across the Great Lakes basin: latitude, land use, and water quality effects. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 1603–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lougheed, V. L., C. A. Parker, and R. J. Stevenson. In press. Evaluation of rapid assessment techniques for establishing wetland condition on a watershed scale. Invited paper. In Ji, W. W., J. Qi, S. Bao, and L. Geying (eds.) Wetland and Water Resource Modeling and Assessment: Watershed Perspective. Science Press, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

  • Mack, J. J. 2001. Ohio Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands, Manual for Using Version 5.0. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface Water, 401 Wetland Ecology Unit, Columbus, Ohio, USA. Ohio EPA Technical Bulletin Wetland/ 2001-1-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune, B. and J. B. Grace. 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Designs, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, L. E., M. P. Driscoll, and M. S. Allen. 2000. Transient physicochemical microhabitats facilitate fish survival in inhospitable aquatic plant stands. Freshwater Biology 44: 617–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muggeo, V. M. R. 2003. Estimating regression models with unknown break-points. Statistics in Medicine 22: 3055–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muradian, R. 2001. Ecological thresholds: a survey. Ecological Economics 38: 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y., R. J. Stevenson, P. Vaithiyanathan, J. Slate, and C. J. Richardson. 2000. Changes in algal assemblages along observed and experimental phosphorus gradients in a subtropical wetland, USA. Freshwater Biology 44: 339–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, S. S., R. S. King, and C. J. Richardson. 2003. Two statistical methods for the detection of environmental thresholds. Ecological Modeling 166: 87–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, M. 1998. Ecology of Shallow Lakes. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, M., S. Szabo, A. Gragnani, E. H. van Nes, S. Rinaldi, N. Kautsky, J. Norberg, R. M. M. Roijackers, and R. J. M. Franken. 2003. Floating plant dominance as a stable state. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 4040–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. J., Y. Pan, and P. Vaithiyanathan. 2002a. Ecological assessment and indicator development in wetlands: the case of algae in the Everglades, USA. Verhandlungen Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Andgewandte Limnologie 28: 1248–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. J., P. V. McCormick, and R. Frydenborg. 2002b. Methods for Evaluating Wetland Condition: Using Algae To Assess Environmental Conditions in Wetlands. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, USA. EPA-822-R-02-021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Z., B. A. Engel, B. C. Pijanowski, and K. J. Lim. 2005. Forecasting Land Use Change and Its Environmental Impact at a Watershed Scale. Journal of Environmental Management. 76: 35–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R. W. 2003. Geographically isolated wetlands of the United States. Wetlands 23: 494–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, D. L. 2002. Classification and regression trees. p. 222–32. In McCune, B. and J. B. Grace (eds.) Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Designs, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1998. National strategy for the development of regional nutrient criteria. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA. EPA 822-R-98-002.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dam, H., A. Mertenes, and J. Sinkeldam. 1994. A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 28: 117–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venables, W. N. and B. D. Ripley. 1994. Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whigham, D. F. and T. E. Jordan. 2003. Isolated wetlands and water quality. Wetlands 23: 541–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, 500 W. University Ave., 79968, El Paso, Texas, USA

    Vanessa L. Lougheed

  2. Department of Zoology, Michigan State University, 48824, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

    Christian A. Parker & R. Jan Stevenson

Authors
  1. Vanessa L. Lougheed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian A. Parker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Jan Stevenson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanessa L. Lougheed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lougheed, V.L., Parker, C.A. & Stevenson, R.J. Using non-linear responses of multiple taxonomic groups to establish criteria indicative of wetland biological condition. Wetlands 27, 96–109 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[96:UNROMT]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[96:UNROMT]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Search

Navigation